СТАН НАУКОВОЇ РОЗРОБЛЕНОСТІ ПРОБЛЕМИ КОМУНІКАЦІЇ ПОТЕРПІЛОГО В КРИМІНАЛЬНОМУ ПРОЦЕСУВАННІ ПРАВ В УКРАЇНІ
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Анотація
У статті досліджено стан наукової розробки проблеми правозахисної комунікації потерпілого у злочинця провадження України. Згідно зі статтею 2 КПК України основним завданням кримінального провадження та суть кримінального процесу є захист потерпілого, його прав, свобод і законних інтересів. Під правом потерпілого на правозахисне спілкування розуміється передбачена кримінально-процесуальним законом можливість потерпілого, його представника, законного представника чи правонаступника отримувати інформацію про кримінальне провадження, обмінюватися інформацією про стан кримінального провадження, впливати на нього. кримінальне провадження з метою захисту та поновлення порушених прав, свобод і законних інтересів відповідного учасника кримінального провадження. Проблема правозахисної комунікації потерпілого покликана ґрунтовно та цілісно інтегрувати численні аспекти, пов’язані із захистом прав та законних інтересів потерпілого. Він також прагне спрямувати нові імпульси наукових досліджень у сфері захисту прав потерпілих на вдосконалення механізму реалізації відповідних прав у змагальному кримінальному процесі на основі жертвоцентричного підходу. У статті розглядаються питання, які ще не порушувалися в наукових працях, але є суттєвими для теорії кримінального процесу та правоохоронної діяльності. У статті наголошується на актуальності обґрунтування та дослідження права потерпілого на процесуальне спілкування та поняття правозахисного спілкування потерпілого у кримінальному провадженні. Він також висвітлює комунікативну рівність як фундаментальну цінність, яка пронизує норми кримінального права та процесу, кримінально-процесуальну діяльність потерпілого, а також комунікаційні гарантії та бар’єри, які сприяють або заважають останній.
Article Details
Розділ
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Як цитувати
Посилання
Ablamskyi, S. Y. (2015). Protection of victim rights and legitimate interests in criminal proceedings: A monograph. Retrieved from http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/4194
Azarov, Y. I., Pysmennyi, D. P., & Khablo O. I. (2014). Compensation for damage to the victim in criminal proceedings at the expense of the state. Legal Science, 5, 49-56.
Davydenko, S. V. (2012). The correlation between the concepts of “duty of proof” and “burden of proof” in the criminal procedural activity of the victim. Law Forum, 4, 283-291.
Davydenko, S. V. (2014). Features of the procedural status of a victim in case of refusal of the prosecutor to support the state prosecution in court. Law and Society, 6(1), 176-182.
Didkivska, H. V. (2018). International experience of the legal status of the victim in criminal proceedings. In I.V. Hloviuk (Ed.). Criminal Procedure Code of 2012: Ideology and Practice of Law Enforcement: Collective Monograph (pp. 177-199). Odesa: “Helvetyka” Publishing House.
Dubivka, I. V. (2017). Pre-trial investigative activities of a lawyer. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs, 233 p.
Herasymchuk, O. P. (2008). Professional protection of a victim’s rights. Lawyer, 2, 40-45.
Herasymchuk, O. P. (2011). Theoretical and practical aspects of professional protection of a victim. Journal of the National University “Ostroh Academy”, 1(3), 1-10.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2013). Problems of criminal proceedings in the form of private prosecution. In V. M. Dromin (Ed.). The legal Life of Modern Ukraine (pp. 426-429). Odessa: Phoenix.
loviuk, I. V. (2013). Problems of recognition of the functional orientation of the victim’s activity in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 1082(16), 233-236.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2014). Certain aspects of evidence in the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings by the investigating judge. Law of Ukraine, 10, 97-105.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2014). Deposit of testimony of a witness and a victim under the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine of 2012. Legal Bulletin, 6, 274-281.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2014). Participation of the victim in criminal procedural evidence: Some issues. Bulletin of the Chernivtsi Faculty of the
NationalUniversity “Odesa Law Academy”, 1, 135-145.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2015). Functions of criminal procedure: Theory, methodology, and practice of implementation based on the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine of 2012. Odesa: “Yurydychna literatura”, 712 p.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2016). The seizure of property as a measure to ensure criminal proceedings: Analysis of novels. Bulletin of the Southern Regional Center of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 8, 155-160.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2017). Conclusion of plea agreements: Certain issues in the context of updating the legislation. Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 316 p.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2017). Some issues of observance of the right to protection during the extended period of pre-trial investigation. In N.M. Bakaianova (Ed.) Advocacy: Past, Present, and Future (pp. 658-660). Odesa: “Helvetyka” Publishing House.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2018). The victim as the initiator of the election and change of the preventive measure in court proceedings in the first instance: aspects of regulatory regulation. In H.O. Ulianova (Ed.). Legal and Institutional Mechanisms for Ensuring the Development of Ukraine in the Conditions of European Integration: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 272-274). Odesa: “Helvetyka” Publishing House.
Hloviuk, I. V. (2021). The victim and the limits of appealing court decisions: Does the CPC need changes? Association of Advocates of Ukraine, 2(51), 21-22.
Horobets, K. V. (2012). Axiosphere of law and its components. Odesa: National University “Odesa Law Academy”, 324 p.
Hoshovskyi, M. I., & Kuchynska, O.P. (1998). A victim in the criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 192 p.
Hroshevyi, Y. M. (1998). Constitution of Ukraine and certain problems of the theory of criminal procedure. Bulletin of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2(13), 125–131.
Hurdzhi, Y. O. (2008). Legal protection of a person in the criminal process of Ukraine: Theory and methodology. Odesa: National University “Odesa Law Academy”, 40 p.
Hurdzhi, Y. O. (2010). Ensuring the legal protection of a person in criminal proceedings: Issues of theory and methodology. Journal of the National University “Ostroh Academy”, 1, 1-15.
Iskenderova, H. T. (2016). Representation and protection of victim rights by a lawyer in criminal proceedings on the basis of a conciliation agreement. Bulletin of Criminal Proceedings, 2, 45-50.
Kaplina, O. V. (2008). Applicable interpretation of the rules of criminal law and procedure: A monograph. Kharkiv: Pravo, 296 p.
Kaplina, O. V. (2009). Applicable interpretation of the rules of criminal law and procedure by the court. Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.
Kavun, D. Y. (2017). A criminal procedure mechanism for ensuring a victim’s (natural person) rights in the pre-trial investigation. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 25 p.
Kostiuchenko, O. Y. (2006). The appeal of court decisions in the criminal process of Ukraine: A monograph. Kyiv: Center “Kyiv University”, 182 p.
Krukevych, O. M. (2017). Administration of justice in criminal proceedings involving juveniles. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University of Kyiv, 20 p.
Krukevych, O. M. (2018). Specialization of judges in criminal proceedings against juveniles. Bulletin of Criminal Proceedings, 2, 42-48.
Krushynskyi, S. A. (2015). The refusal of a victim (private prosecutor) from the prosecution: The concept, procedure, and legal consequences. University Scientific Notes, 2(54), 212-220.
Krykunov, O. V. (2001). A psychological examination of a victim as a means of proving a civil claim for compensation for moral damage. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, 5, 46-48.
Kuchynska, O. P. (2009). Problems of protection of victim rights in the criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Lawyer, 5(2), 10-12.
Kuchynska, O. P. (2017). Some issues of the procedural status of a victim under the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine. Actual problems of improving the criminal procedural legislation (p. 108). Odesa: “Yurydychna literatura”.
Omelchenko, T. V. (2004). The constitutional right of a person to legal assistance and its implementation at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 20 p.
Osinska, O. M. (2016). Problematic issues of acquiring by a person the procedural status of a victim in the criminal process of Ukraine. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 4(75), 96–101.
Ostrovska, M. A. (2018). Counteraction to crime through the improvement of the procedural status of the victim. Counteraction to Crime: Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the VIII
International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 63-67). Kyiv: National Academy of Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine.
Ovcharenko, O. M. (2015). Reforming the criminal justice authorities of Ukraine in accordance with European standards: Conceptual analysis: A monograph. Kharkiv: Research Institute for the Study of Crime Problems named after academician V.V. Stashys, 242 p.
Perepelytsia, S.I. (2014). Criminal proceedings in the form of private prosecution. Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 201 p.
Pohoretskyi, M.A., & Serhieieva, D. B. (2017). Problematic issues of the implementation of theprocedural status of the victim in criminal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 46(2), 118-123.
Pozhar, V. H. (2010). Institute of representation in criminal proceedings. Odesa: National University “Odesa Law Academy”, 20 p.
Pozhar, V. H. (2013). Procedural status of the victim under the new Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: Positive steps and gaps in legal regulation. Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2, 126-131.
Shybiko, V. P. (2013). The problem of ensuring the rights of the victim under the new CPC of Ukraine of 2012. Legal Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1, 307-313.
Smyrnov, M. I. (2013). Features of criminal proceedings in the form of private prosecution. Implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine in law enforcement and educational process: Experience and ways of improvement (pp. 64-68). Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs.
Solonova, O. O. (2015). Procedural status of the victim: Problematic issues and ways of improvement. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 1, 139-145.
Tataryn, I. I. (2015). Ensuring compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense during a pre-trial investigation: Lviv: The Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 223 p.
Titko, I. A. (2016). Legal support and practice of realization of private interest in the criminal process of Ukraine: A monograph. Kharkiv: Pravo, 460 p.
Tlepova, M. I. (2016). The procedural status of the victim during the pre-trial investigation. Khatkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 23 p.
Tokarska, A. S. (2008). Legal communication in the context of the post-classical understanding of the law. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs, 38 p.
Torbas, O. O. (2015). Refusal of the victim from the prosecution as a basis for the termination of criminal proceedings. Topical issues of state-building in Ukraine (pp. 442-444). Kyiv: Print-Service.
Torbas, O. O. (2021). Discretion in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. Odesa: National University “Odesa Law Academy”, 478 p.
Voloshina, V. K., & Kovalov, A. H. (2018). Implementation of the right to professional legal assistance in criminal proceedings. In I.V. Hloviuk (Ed.). Criminal Procedure Code of 2012: Ideology and Practice of Law Enforcement: Collective Monograph (pp. 236-261). Odesa: “Helvetyka” Publishing House.
Vvedenska, V. V. (2009). Criminal procedure guarantees for the exercise of the right to legal assistance of persons affected by a crime. Kyiv: National Academy of the Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine.
Yanovska, O. H. (2013). Features of criminal proceedings in the form of private prosecution under the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Journal of Kyiv University of Law, 1, 242-245.