THE STATE OF SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROBLEM OF ABUSE OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to the investigation of the stages of formation of domestic civil procedural opinion in view of the problem of unfair procedural behavior and law abuse. The list of scientific problems developed at that time can include, albeit with certain reservations, the problem of abuse of procedural rights, which also received some elucidation in numerous legislative sources and materials of recent judicial practice. The Soviet period of the development of the science of civil procedural law is characterized by
an almost complete rejection of already accumulated legislative experience and systemic knowledge, attempts to justify and prove the advantages of the new system and socialist justice, which found its specific reflection in the civil procedural form of realization rights and obligations. This thesis is quite applicable to the problem of abuse of civil procedural rights. For modern Ukraine, the problem of abuse of civil procedural rights has not only not lost its significance, but also sounds even more acute than in the previous stages of the development of judicial power and the lawsuit. A major update of the civil procedural legislation and expansion of the dispositive and competetive powers of the litigant actualizes the issue of the limits of active and lawful behavior of the litigants, responsibility for violation of the order of civil procedural actions, possible types of abuse of procedural rights and countermeasures against them. This is especially relevant in the conditions of essentially unlimited possibilities of the litigants, the origins of which should be sought in the nature of the principles of competition and dispositiveness. As a result, there is a potential possibility of unfair procedural behavior. In this regard, we have open questions, which related to characteristic signs of abuse of procedural rights, the possibility of their division into groups, and legislative regulation remain open.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Butnev, V. V. (1989). The essence and procedure for the implementation of civil procedural liability. Yaroslavl: Yaroslav. state univ., 3-47.
Bychkova, S. S., & Churpita, G. V. (2015). Abuse of civil procedural rights. Forensic Herald, 2 (24), 13-14.
Chabanenko, M. M. (2020). On the issue of abuse of procedural rights in the domestic civil process. Comparative And Analytical Law, 2, 76 p.
Chechina, N. A. (2004). Selected works on civil process. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State. Univ, 622-626.
Kolesnikov, B. (2018). Abuse of civil procedural rights: novel civil procedure. Entrepreneurship, Economy And Law, 7, 22-27. Retrieved from: http://www.pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2018/7/5.pdf
Komarov, V. V., Bigun, V. A., & Barankova, V. V. (2002). Problems of the science of civil procedural law. Kharkiv: Law, 26-44.
Kot, O. O. (2017). Certain aspects of abuse of procedural rights. Periodical Of The Supreme Court Of Ukraine, 1 (197), 36-44.
Kurylo, M. P. (2015). The science of civil process at the turn of the century: an essay on the development of the idea of the unity of the process. Judicial Appeal, 3, 104–112.
Kuznets, O. M. (2016). Subjects of abuse of rights in civil and executive proceedings (Ph.D. thesis). Kyiv: Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretsky National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 3-5.
Luspenyk, D. D. (2015). Abuse of procedural rights: legislative regulation, methods of detection and countermeasures. Journal Of Civil And Criminal Justice, 151-170.
Marunich, G. (2016). «Prolongation of the civil process» and «abuse of civil procedural rights»: correlation of concepts. Entrepreneurship, Economy And Law, 9, 15-17. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pgip_2016_9_4
Polyansky, T. (2013). Abuse of procedural rights: legal means of prevention and opportunities for their improvement. Periodical Of The National Academy Of Legal Sciences Of Ukraine, 3. 33-37. Retrieved from: http://visnyk.kh.ua/uk/article/zlovzhivannya-protsesualnimipravami-yuridichni-zasobi-poperedzhennya-ta-mozhlivosti-yikh-udoskonalennya
Sobchak, A. A., & Shevchenko, Y. N. (1988). Increasing the role of civil liability in protecting the rights and interests of citizens and organizations. Kyiv: Science thought, 194-234.
Stefan, M.Y. (1997). Civil process. Second edition, revised and supplemented. Kyiv: «In Yure» Publishing House, 251 p.
Tkachuk, A. O. (2020). Abuse of procedural rights in the civil process of Ukraine (Doctoral dissertation). National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv.
askovsky, E. V. (1917). Textbook of civil procedure. Second edition, revised. Moscow: Edition Br. Bashmakov, 669-677.
Zhurba, I. (2013). Abuse of procedural rights by parties in civil proceedings. Bulletin Of The Kyiv National University Named After T. Shevchenko, 4 (98), 103-105.