Additional guarantees of observance of the rights and freedoms of specially designated subjects during the conduct of covert investigative (search) actions

Main Article Content

Oleksandr Babikov

Abstract

The article examines the additional guarantees provided to specially designated subjects—such as lawyers, journalists, medical professionals, and public officials—during covert investigative (search) actions. These subjects hold positions that require heightened protections due to the sensitive nature of their roles and responsibilities. The study analyzes the legal frameworks, both national and international, that aim to safeguard the rights and freedoms of these individuals when subjected to covert surveillance, searches, or other investigative activities. It emphasizes the need for stringent oversight mechanisms, legal safeguards, and procedural transparency to prevent abuse and ensure that any encroachment on rights is justified, proportionate, and lawful. The article also identifies gaps in existing regulations and suggests enhancements to better protect specially designated subjects, thereby balancing the needs of law enforcement with the preservation of fundamental human rights.

Article Details

Section

ARTICLES

How to Cite

Additional guarantees of observance of the rights and freedoms of specially designated subjects during the conduct of covert investigative (search) actions. (2024). LEGAL HORIZONS, 21(2), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2024.2.pp.53-68

References

Constitution of Ukraine. (1996). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр#Text

Babikov O.P. (2021). "Expediency and threats of the use of covert measures to obtain information": materials of the international scientific-practical conference "Current issues of legal science and practice in the 21st century" Rivne, September 23-24, 2021.

Interception of telephones in the international law and legislation of eleven European countries (Great Britain, Germany, Finland, France, Switzerland, Sweden, Hungary, Poland, the Russian Federation, Romania Ukraine). (2014). https://khpg.org/1084719187

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015#Text

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1973). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043#Text

Convention on Migrant Workers. (1975). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/993_159#Text

Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2022). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/4651-17#Text

European Court of Human Rights: The case of Yuvig v. France. (1990). Kharkiv Human Rights Group. Access mode: http://privacy.khpg.org/1604922590

Law of Ukraine No 2135-XII "On operational and investigative activities". (1992). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2135-12#Text

Law of Ukraine No 3341-XII “On Organizational and Legal Basis of Combating Organized Crime”. (1993). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3341-12#Text

Law of Ukraine No 1402-VIII “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges”. (2016). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text

Law of Ukraine No 5076-VI “On Advocacy”. (2013). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5076-17#Text

Resolution of the Supreme Court No 536/2475/14-k (2019). https://zib.com.ua/ua/141611-vp_vs_viznala_scho_genprokuror_ne_buv_zobovyazaniy_vruchati_.html

Judgment of the European Court of Human Right No 12323/11 “Misho v. France”. (2012). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:%5B%22001-115377%22%5D%7D

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights No 69436/10 (Section IV) “Brito Ferrinho Bexiga Villa-Nova v. Portugal”. (2015). Retrieved from:https://base.garant.ru/71414612/

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights no. 28798/13 “Ordre des avocats de Brest and Laurent v. France” (2018). Retrieved from: http://aoskif.com.ua/ua/blog/perehoplennya-povidomlen-advokata-telefonnih-dzvinkiv-ta-tayemne-sposterezhennya-praktika-yespl

Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights No 23224/94 “Kopp v. Switzerland”. (1998). Retrieved from: https://europeancourt.ru/resheniya-evropejskogo-suda-na-russkom-yazyke/kopp-protiv-shvejcarii-postanovlenie-evropejskogo-suda/

Judgment of the European Court of Human Right No 30181/05 “Pruteanu v. Romania”. (2015). Retrieved from: https://pdpecho.com/tag/pruteanu-v-romania/

Newsletter – Professional Secret Lawyer. (2021). European Court of Human Rights: Ukrainian Aspect. Retrieved from: https://www.echr.com.ua/publication/profesijna-tayemnicya-advokata/

Pogoretsky, M.A., & Pogoretsky, M.M. (2016). Guarantees of legal secrecy in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and their implementation impact on the criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and law enforcement practice. Bulletin of criminal proceedings, 2, 77-87

Titova, N.M. (2011). Influence of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the formation of the status of a lawyer. Law Practice, 4. Retrieved from: http://www.dom-prava.com/publications/titova-n.m.–vliyanie-resheniy-evropeyskogo-suda-po-pravam-cheloveka-na-formirovanie