Common and Civil Law Approaches to Documentary Evidence in International Arbitration
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Submission of documentary evidence occupies a substantial part of international arbitration proceedings and efficiency of this procedure predetermines a success of arbitration. This matter gets quite complicated and challenging when an arbitration involves parties from different legal cultures. As a consequence, arbitral proceedings could take a long time and cause discontent among its users. Therefore, the analysis of ways and methods of raising the efficiency of the document submission is important for the effective international dispute resolution. The work examines arbitration rules of several arbitral institutions, law and practice of UK and the USA as the common law jurisdictions, which have different scope of document discovery. Then civil law jurisdictions like Germany, Uzbekistan are considered which do not practice common law type of document discovery, with a very limited scope. The paper also considers some hypothetical situations connected with the document production and evaluate its efficiency in international arbitration proceedings. It also observes common/civil law approaches that have shaped practices in the field. The views on how efficiency of this procedure can be raised are also analyzed, the IBA and Prague Rules are considered. It is argued that a certain degree of convergence in the documentary evidence practices is taking place in international arbitration, concluding with the forward-looking remarks.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Argerich, S., (2019). A Comparison of the IBA and Prague Rules: Comparing Two of the Same. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. Available at: https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/03/02/a-comparison-of-the-iba-and-prague-rules-comparing-two-of-the-same/ [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Baier, J., et al., (2021). Perspectives on Document Disclosure. Global Arbitration Review. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-evidence-in-international-arbitration/1st-edition/article/perspectives-document-disclosure [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Blackaby, N., et. al. (2015). Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. – Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 6th ed.
Böckstiegel, K., (2010). ‘Taking Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration – Legal Framework and Trends in Practice’ in Böckstiegel K. et al. The Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration. – Köln: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH.
Brower, C. and Sharpe, J., (2008). ‘Determining the Extent of Discovery and Dealing with Requests for Discovery: Perspectives from the Common Law’ in Newman L. and Hill R. The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration. 2nd ed. – New York: Juris Publishing Inc.
Cremades, B. and Cairus, D., (2010). ‘Cross-Examination and International Arbitration’ in Hober K. et al. Between East and West: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke. Juris.
Derains, Y., (2006). ‘Towards Greater Efficiency in Document Production before Arbitral tribunals – A Continental Viewpoint’. Document Production in International Arbitration. Special Supplement of ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin.
DIS Arbitration Rules (2018), Available at: https://www.disarb.org/en/tools-for-dis-proceedings/dis-rules [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Economic Procedure Code of Uzbekistan (2018), Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/3523895#3528534 [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Hamilton, V., (2006). ‘Document Production in ICC Arbitration’. Document Production in International Arbitration. Special Supplement of ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin. – Paris.
Hanotiau, B., (2006). ‘Document Production in International Arbitration: A Tentative Definition of ‘Best Practices’. Document Production in International Arbitration. Special Supplement of ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin.
Houtte, H., (2005). ‘Counsel-Witness Relations and Professional Misconduct in Civil Law Systems’. Arbitration and Oral Evidence. Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law. – Paris: ICC Publishing S.A.
IBA Rules on Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration (2020), Available at: www.ibanet.org [Accessed 20.04.2025].
ICC Arbitration Rules (2021), Available at: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-procedure/2021-arbitration-rules/#block-accordion-25 [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Kimmelman, L. and MacGrath, D., (2006). ‘Document Production in the United States’. Document Production in International Arbitration. Special Supplement of ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin.
King, B. and Bosman, L., (2001). ‘Rethinking Discovery in International Arbitration: Beyond the Common Law/Civil Law Divide’. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin. Vol. 12/No. 1.
Law of Uzbekistan “On International Commercial Arbitration” (2021), Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/5294087 [Accessed 18.01.2025].
LCIA Arbitration Rules (2020), Available at: https://www.lcia.org/Dispute_Resolution_Services/lcia-arbitration-rules-2020.aspx#Article%2022 [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Lionnet, K., (2005). ‘Once Again: Is Discovery of Documents Appropriate in International Arbitration?’. Aksen G. et al. Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner. – Paris: ICC Publishing.
Neuhaus, J., et al. (2023) The 2020 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration: A History and Discussion of the 2020 Revisions. The Guide to Evidence in International Arbitration. 2nd ed. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-evidence-in-international-arbitration/2nd-edition/article/the-2020-iba-rules-the-taking-of-evidence-in-international-arbitration-history-and-discussion-of-the-2020-revisions#footnote-082 [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Prague Rules (2018), Available at: https://praguerules.com/upload/medialibrary/9dc/9dc31ba7799e26473d92961d926948c9.pdf [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Raeschke-Kessler, H., (2010). ‘Discovery in International Commercial Arbitration?’ in Böckstiegel K. et al. The Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration. – Köln: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH.
Smit, R., (2006). ‘Towards Greater Efficiency in Document Production before Arbitral Tribunals – a North American Viewpoint’. Document Production in International Arbitration. Special Supplement of ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin.
Stipanowich, T., (2021). Soft Law in the Organization and General Conduct of Commercial Arbitration Proceedings. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2407187 [Accessed 18.01.2025].
Tashkent International Arbitration Center’s (TIAC) Arbitration Rules (2021), Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c02f6d29772ae05d0a897a8/t/6352b96baa109a5a2a49bd9d/166636580 8793/TIAC+RULES++OF+ARBITRATION+2021+.pdf [Accessed 18.01.2025].
The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2021), Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/21-07996_expedited-arbitration-e-ebook.pdf [Accessed 20.04.2025].
Veeder, V., (2006). ‘Document Production in England: Legislative Developments and Current Arbitral Practice’. Document Production in International Arbitration. Special Supplement of ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin.