Measures to prevent theft of other people's property in a state of war
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the pressing issue of preventing theft of property, one of the most common criminal offenses against property, which poses a particular threat to society in conditions of martial law. Armed aggression against Ukraine, the introduction of martial law, mass population displacement, destruction of infrastructure, a decline in the material well-being of citizens, and limited resources of law enforcement agencies increase the risk of theft and at the same time complicate the implementation of preventive measures. The paper identifies and analyzes the main types of prevention of theft of other people's property, in particular, general social, special criminological, and individual prevention. Particular attention is paid to special criminological measures to prevent theft, which are aimed at neutralizing the causes and conditions for committing these criminal offenses in modern conditions. Such measures include ensuring the principle of inevitability of criminal responsibility for committed offenses, timely detection and investigation of thefts, improving the operational-investigative and preventive activities of the National Police, strengthening control over the circulation of property in wartime, and intensifying cooperation between law enforcement agencies, local authorities, and the public. Separate emphasis is placed on the importance of raising citizens' legal awareness and vigilance, and fostering a responsible attitude towards the preservation of their property, especially in conditions of evacuation, temporary abandonment of their homes, or residence in frontline regions. It is concluded that effective prevention of theft during martial law is only possible through the comprehensive application of criminal law, criminological, organizational, and social measures adapted to the realities of wartime.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Babenko, A. M. (2014). Zapobihannia zlochynnosti v rehionakh Ukrainy: Kontseptualno-metodolohichnyi ta prakseolohichnyi vymir [Prevention of crime in the regions of Ukraine: Conceptual-methodological and praxeological dimension]. Odesa: ODUVS.
Ostrohliadov, O. I. (2020a). Determinatsiia koryslyvykh zlochyniv proty vlasnosti u velykykh mistakh Prychornomorskoho rehionu (viktymolohichnyi aspekt). Pytannia borotby zi zlochynnistiu, (39), 114–120.
Ostrohliadov, O. I. (2020b). Kryminolohichna kharakterystyka ta zapobihannia koryslyvym zlochynam proty vlasnosti u velykomu misti Prychornomorskoho rehionu. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys, (3), 88–93.
Babenko, A. M., Busol, O. Yu., Kostenko, O. M., et al. (2018). Kryminolohiia. Kharkiv: Pravo.
Babenko, A. M. (2014). Prevention of crime in the regions of Ukraine: Conceptual-methodological and praxeological dimension. Odesa: ODUVS.
Dzhuzha, O. M., Mykhailenko, P. P., & Kulyk, O. H. (Eds.). (2001). Kurs kryminolohii: Zahalna chastyna. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Lytvynov, O. M. (2008). Sotsialno-pravovyi mekhanizm protydii zlochynnosti v Ukraini. Kharkiv: KhNUVS.
Kleemans, E. R., Soudijn, M. R. J., & Weenink, A. W. (2012). Organized crime, situational crime prevention and routine activity theory. Trends in Organized Crime, 15(2–3), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-012-9173-1
Ostrohliadov, O. I. (2019). Viktymolohichna kharakterystyka koryslyvykh zlochyniv proty vlasnosti u velykomu misti Prychornomorskoho rehionu: Urbanistychnyi ta rehionalnyi vymir. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys, (4), 134–138.
Ostrohliadov, O. I. (2020). Criminological characteristics and prevention of acquisitive crimes against property in large cities. South Ukrainian Law Journal, (3), 88–93.
Schaefer, L. (2021). Routine activity theory. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.326
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Crime prevention and criminal justice module. https://www.unodc.org
World Bank. (2011). World development report 2011: Conflict, security, and development. World Bank.
Sobko, G., Loza, D., Svintsytskyi, A., Firman, V., & Shchokin, R. (2023). Criminological and criminal signs of mental violence in crimes against public security under the criminal law of Ukraine. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 14(4), 69–88.
Anderezh, D. O., Kanjo, E., Anwar, A., Johnson, S., & Lucy, D. (2021). The rise of technology in crime prevention: Opportunities, challenges and practitioners’ perspectives. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349125315_The_Rise_of_Technology_in_Crime_Prevention_Opportunities_Challenges_and_Practitioners_Perspectives
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer.
Felson, M. (1994). Crime and everyday life. Pine Forge Press.
Felson, M., & Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity makes the thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. Home Office.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25(2), 236–258.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Crime prevention and criminal justice module. https://www.unodc.org
Coupe, R. T. (2016). Evaluating the effects of resources and solvability on burglary detection. Policing and Society, 26(5), 563–587.