Features of civil society institutions’ participation in combating corruption in ukraine during armed aggression
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the role of civil society institutions in the formation and implementation of Ukraine’s anti-corruption policy within the context of European integration. It argues that active citizen participation in decision-making processes is a key prerequisite for effective anti-corruption efforts, as civil society serves as an important mechanism of public oversight and democratic influence on state authorities. The study identifies major challenges associated with the high level of corruption in public administration, law enforcement, and judicial institutions, which significantly limits the effectiveness of public initiatives. Although legal frameworks provide for public participation in anti-corruption policy, existing instruments of civic control remain insufficient due to limited transparency of state institutions and the lack of real mechanisms for influencing decision-making. Particular attention is given to the impact of European integration processes on the development of Ukraine’s anti-corruption system. The implementation of obligations under the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement and visa liberalisation framework necessitates enhanced public oversight and broader involvement of civil society in monitoring compliance with anti-corruption legislation. International support has contributed to strengthening the role of non-governmental organisations, which increasingly act as partners of the state in preventing and combating corruption. At the same time, the study emphasises the need to improve communication between government institutions and civil society, expand access to public information, and ensure effective feedback mechanisms. Overcoming public scepticism towards civil society initiatives requires their institutional strengthening and provision of real powers and resources. It is concluded that effective cooperation between civil society and the state is essential for promoting transparency, accountability, and the rule of law in Ukraine.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
• Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2019). Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28 chervnia 2019 roku № 254k/96-VR [Constitution of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine No. 254k/96-VR of June 28, 2019]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр
• Barmatova, S. P. (2012). Hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: Tendentsii ta zahrozy [Civil society in Ukraine: Trends and threats]. Rynok pratsi ta zainiatist naselennia, (1), 27–29. https://files.znu.edu.ua/files/2017/skachano/RPtaZN/RPtaZN2012n1/10.pdf
• Khomei, O. D. (2021). Vzaiemodiia hromadianskoho suspilstva ta orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady v umovakh intehratsii Ukrainy v YeS [Interaction of civil society and public authorities in the context of Ukraine’s integration into the EU] (Doctoral dissertation). https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2021-08/disertaciya_khomey_-26-08-2021.pdf
• Zaiats, B. R. (2019). Istoriohrafiia rozvytku instytutu pravovoho rehuliuvannia zaluchennia hromadskosti do zakhodiv iz zapobihannia koruptsii v orhanakh derzhavnoi vlady ta orhanakh mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Historiography of the development of the institute of legal regulation of public involvement in anti-corruption measures in public authorities and local self-government bodies]. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava, 3(1), 143–149.
• National Agency on Corruption Prevention. (n.d.). Mizhnarodna pidtrymka antykoruptsiinykh reform: NAZK i OBSE obhovoryly podalshu spivpratsiu v sferi zapobihannia koruptsii [International support for anti-corruption reforms: NACP and OSCE discuss further cooperation in corruption prevention]. https://nazk.gov.ua/uk/novyny/mizhnarodna-pidtrymka-antykoruptsiynyh-reform-nazk-i-obse-obgovoryly-podalshu-spivpratsyu-v-sferi-zapobigannya-koruptsii/
• Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2014). Pro zapobihannia koruptsii: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14 zhovtnia 2014 roku № 1700-VII [On prevention of corruption: Law of Ukraine No. 1700-VII of October 14, 2014]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1700-18
• Dubas, V. M. (2023). Poniattia ta vydy koruptsiinykh kryminalnykh pravoporushen u kryminalnomu zakonodavstvi Ukrainy [Concept and types of corruption criminal offenses in the criminal legislation of Ukraine]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, (6), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-6/13
• Lysko, T. D., & Riepkina, Yu. Ye. (2020). Problemy pravovoi vyznachenosti yurydychnykh definitsii koruptsiinykh kryminalnykh pravoporushen: Deiaki teoretychni ta pravozastosovni aspekty [Problems of legal certainty of legal definitions of corruption criminal offenses: Some theoretical and law enforcement aspects]. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurydychnyi visnyk “Povitriane i kosmichne pravo”, 4(57), 169–174. https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/47184
• Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2012). Pro hromadski obiednannia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22 bereznia 2012 roku № 4572-VI [On public associations: Law of Ukraine No. 4572-VI of March 22, 2012]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4572-17#Text
• Mesiuk, M. P. (2018). Vzaiemodiia instytutiv vlady ta hromadianskoho suspilstva v Ukraini u konteksti yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv [Interaction of government institutions and civil society in Ukraine in the context of European integration processes]. Investytsii: Praktyka ta dosvid, (8), 87–93.
• United Nations. (2003). Konventsiia Orhanizatsii Obiednanykh Natsii proty koruptsii [United Nations Convention against Corruption]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_c16#Text
• Utkina, M. S. (2024). Vplyv hromadianskoho suspilstva na efektyvnist antykoruptsiinykh instytutsii [Influence of civil society on the effectiveness of anti-corruption institutions]. Akademichni vizii, (37). https://www.academy-vision.org/index.php/av/article/view/1511
• European Commission. (2023). Ukraine 2023 report. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press.
• OECD. (2018). Anti-corruption and integrity in public procurement. OECD Publishing.
• Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://www.transparency.org
• World Bank. (2020). Anticorruption for development: Global report. World Bank.
• World Bank. (2022). Worldwide governance indicators. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
• Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy assistance and civil society in an authoritarian age. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
• Constitution of Ukraine. (1996). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua
• Council of Europe. (2017). Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan: Monitoring Matrix. Council of Europe Publishing.
• European Commission. (2024). EU-Ukraine relations: Rule of law and anti-corruption progress report. European Commission.
• Fagan, A., & Sircar, I. (2019). Civil society and anti-corruption: Roles and challenges in transitional contexts. Governance and Development Review, 7(2), 112–130.
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.
• Grzymala-Busse, A. (2015). Great expectations: The EU and domestic political competition in East Central Europe. Cambridge University Press.
• Heidenheimer, A. J., & Johnston, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political corruption: Concepts and contexts. Transaction Publishers.
• Johnston, M. (2014). Corruption, contention and reform: The power of deep democratization. Cambridge University Press.
• Kubicek, P. (2019). Ukraine’s anti-corruption reforms: Political will and implementation gaps. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(9), 1377–1398.
• Kuzio, T. (2018). Corruption and reform in Ukraine. Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 112–124.
• Myloserdna, I. M. (2019). Civil society participation in anti-corruption policy: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Politics, 12(3), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2019.3.6
• Öztürk, A. E. (2019). Civil society engagement in anti-corruption reforms: Comparative evidence. Democratization, 26(5), 788–807.
• Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail: Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Cambridge University Press.
• Petrova, T. (2011). Foreign funding, domestic activism, and the state: NGO development in Russia and Ukraine. Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Pidhoretskyi, O. (2021). Civil society and legal frameworks in Ukraine: Gaps and prospects. Ukrainian Journal of Public Policy, 3(1), 78–100.
• Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press.
• Schedler, A. (1999). Conceptualizing accountability. In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 13–28). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Transparency International.
• United Nations. (2004). United Nations Convention against Corruption. United Nations.
• Utkin, M. S. (2022). Forms of civil society engagement in anti-corruption practice in Ukraine. Journal of Anti-Corruption Studies, 5(1), 1–17.
• World Bank. (2021). Governance and anti-corruption: Ukraine progress overview. World Bank.
• della Porta, D., & Mattoni, A. (2021). Civil society against corruption. In A. Bågenholm et al. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Quality of Government. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198858218.013.15
• Kulyk, K. D. (2025). Civil anti-corruption monitoring as an important element of corruption prevention in Ukraine. Constitutional State, 59, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.18524/2411-2054.2025.59.340311
• Mykolaienko, R. V. (2023). The role of civil society institutions in preventing and combating corruption in public authorities. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Pravo, 2, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2023-15-163-167
• Nalyvaiko, I. (2022). Rоль інститутів громадянського суспільства у запобіганні і протидії корупції в органах публічної влади. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo.
• Ortinski, V. (2020). The role of civil society and the media in the fight against corruption. Visnyk NU “Lvivska politechnika”, 7(27), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23939/law2020.27.001
• Pidberezhnyk, N. P. (2016). Public participation in preventing and combating corruption in Ukraine in the context of European integration processes. Efficiency of Public Administration, 48. https://doi.org/10.33990/2070-4011.48.2016.175770
• Transparency International. (2015). Civil society participation, public accountability and the UN Convention against Corruption. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/civil-society-participation-public-accountability-and-the-uncac?utm_source
• Transparency International Knowledge Hub. (2025). Civil society. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/topics/civil-society-parent-label?utm_source
• Villanueva, P. A. G. (2020). Why civil society cannot battle it all alone: The roles of civil society environment, transparent laws and quality of public administration in political corruption mitigation. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(6), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1638933