CONTROVERSIAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE IDEOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SYSTEM OF PRISON DISCIPLINE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present article delves into the origins and theoretical underpinnings of the carceral model of corrective punishment at Walnut Street Prison and the system of solitary confinement at Eastern State Penitentiary. The central research question to the extent to which the ideology advocated by the Society of Friends served as a formative influence in shaping the Pennsylvania system of prison discipline and its implementation in practice, as frequently acknowledged in historiography. To probe this inquiry, we have resorted to primary source materials and literature addressing the historical trajectory of penal institutions in Pennsylvania. It has been ascertained that the contention positing the pivotal involvement of the Society of Friends in the reformatory initiative gained traction primarily within the European penitentiary discourse on penology, through accounts of American prisons penned by La Rochefoucauld, Niemcewicz, Beaumont, and Tocqueville. The carceral model at Walnut Street Prison, characterized by distinctive attributes encompassing segregated confinement, hard labor, distinct treatment protocols grave for the most egregious of offenders, and administrative oversight by the Board of Inspectors, largely adhered to the English carceral model of corrective punishment. The conviction in the redemptive potential of seclusion was intrinsic to both religious and materialist penitentiary discourses of the era. Therefore, the ideology of the Society of Friends was not determinative here. The establishment of the system of separate and solitary confinement during the 1820s was instigated by the challenges encountered within the carceral model of Walnut Street Prison. It was a complex process and cannot be reduced to the realization of one religious group’s idea: it took into account the practical experience of prisons in Pennsylvania and other states, the theoretical research, and analyzed statistical data. The reform was predated by active public discourse and scholarly dialogues appraising the merits and limitations inherent in diverse models of prison discipline.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Actes du Congres penitentiaire international de Rome. (1888). Publies par les soins du Comité exécutif , T. I. Rome.
Adamson, C. (2001). Evangelical Quakerism and the Early American Penitentiary Revisited: The Contributions of Thomas Eddy, Roberts Vaux, John Griscom, Stephen Grellet, Elisha Bates, and Isaac Hopper. Quaker History, 90 (2), 35-58.
Alexander, M. E. (1966). Changing Concepts in Corrections. Proceedings of Fifth Annual Conference “Mental Health Career Development”. Phoenix Arizona. US Department of Health Education and Welfare, 26-29.
An Act amending the penal laws of this state (1786). Statutes at Large of Pennsylvania 1682 to 1801. Vol. XII. Harrisburg, 280-290.
Barnes, H. E. (1927). The evolution of penology in Pennsylvania : a study in American social history. Indianapolis.
Bradford, W. (1793). An enquiry how far the punishment of death is necessary in Pennsylvania. To which is added, an Account of the gaol and penitentiary house of Philadelphia. By Caleb Lownes. Philadelphia.
Colvin, M. (1997). Penitentiaries, reformatories, and chain gangs : social theory and the history of punishment in nineteenth-century America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
De Beaumont, G., De Tocqueville, A. (1833). On the Penitentiary System in the United States. Philadelphia, Carey, Lea & Blanchard.
DePuy, L. B. (1951). The Walnut Street Prison: Pennsylvania’s first penitentiary. Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, 18(2), 130-144.
First Annual Report of the Board of Managers of the Prison Discipline Society, Boston June, 1826. (1827). Boston.
Gibson, M. (2019). Italian Prisons in the Age of Positivism, 1861-1914. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Graber, J. (2008). “When Friends Had the Management It Was Entirely Different”: Quakers and Calvinists in the Making of New York Prison Discipline. Quaker History, 97(2), 19-40.
Graber, J. (2011). The Furnace of Affliction: Prisons & Religion in Antebellum America. University of North Carolina Press.
Handbook of Correctional Institution Design and Construction. (1949). United States Bureau of Prisons.
Hawke, D. F. (1971). Benjamin Rush; Revolutionary Gadfly. The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Hirsch, J. A. (1982). From Pillory to Penitentiary: The Rise of Criminal Incarceration in Early Massachusetts. Michigan Law Review, 80, 1179–1269.
Ignatieff, M. (1978). A just measure of pain : the penitentiary in the industrial revolution, 1750-1850. New York : Pantheon Books.
Interview with Myrl E. Alexander. What Life Is Like in Today's Federal Prisons. From the US News & World Report. July 11, 1966. In: District of Columbia Appropriations for Fiscal Year (1967). Hearings before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Eighty Ninth Congress Second Session. Washington.
Journal of the Senate of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1827-1828. (1828). Harrisburgh.
La Rochefoucauld, F.-A.-F. (1796). Des prisons de Philadelphie. Paris.
Letter, Report and Documents on the Penal Code, from the President and Commissioners Appointed to Superintend the Erection of the Eastern Penitentiary. (1828).
Manion, J. (2015). Liberty's Prisoners: Carceral Culture in Early America. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Meranze, M. (1984). The Penitential Ideal in Late Eighteenth-Century Philadelphia. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 108(4), 419-450.
Minutes of the Supreme Executive Council of Pennsylvania. (1853). V. 15. Harrisburg.
Niemcewicz, J. U. (1818). O więzieniach publicznych, czyli Domach Pokuty rzecz krótka, Warszawa-Krzemieniec.
Rothman, D. J. (1990). The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Rubin, A. T. (2013). Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829-1875. [A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of California, Berkeley].
Rubin, A. T. (2021). The Deviant Prison: Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary and the Origins of America’s Modern Penal System, 1829-1913. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108754095
Schmid, M. (2003). “The Eye of God”: Religious Beliefs and Punishment in Early Nineteenth-Century Prison Reform. Theology Today, 59(4), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057360305900403
Sellin, T. (1953). Philadelphia Prisons of the Eighteenth Century. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 43 (1), 326-331.
Shaler, C., King, E., & Wharton, T. I. (1828) Report of the Commissioners on the Penal Code. Harrisburg.
Shapiro, D. M. (2019). Solitary confinement in the young republic. Harvard Law Review, 133(2), 544-598.
Skotnicki, A. (2000). Religion and the development of the American penal system. Lanham, University Press of America.
Spierenburg, P. (2007). The Prison Experience: Disciplinary Institutions and Their Inmates in Early Modern Europe. Amsterdam University Press.
Synopsis of the Visits to Prisoners. The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy, 1884, 1.
Teeters, N. K. (1955). The Cradle of the Penitentiary: The Walnut Street Jail at Philadelphia, 1773-1835. Pennsylvania Prison Society.
Vasilyeva, S. (2015). Quakers’ Ideology and the Formation of the Philadelphia Prison System. The Bulletin of Ryazan State University named for S. A. Yesenin, 4 (49), 64-74.
Vassilyeva, S. Genesis and evolution of the doctrine of penitentiarianism in the Anglo-American socio-cultural space (late 17th - early 19th centuries). [Doctoral dissertation, The Academy of Law Management of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia].
Vaux, R. (1826). Notices of the Original, and Successive Efforts, to Improve the Discipline of the Prison at Philadelphia, and to Reform the Criminal Code of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania.
Yarmysh, O., Sokalska, O., & Kyrychenko, V. (2021). Genesis of the concept of correctional punishment: from antiquity to modern times. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(3), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.28(3).2021.162-17.