Current issues in legal prevention and counteraction of crime in the field of information technologies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article analyses contemporary challenges in the legal prevention and combating of cybercrime amid rapid digitalisation, expansion of cyberspace, and advances in telecommunications. Cybercrime is characterised as a dynamic and transnational phenomenon encompassing offences such as unauthorised interference with computer systems, illegal collection of personal data, distribution of malicious software, phishing, social engineering, and violations of intellectual property rights. Key factors hindering effective counteraction are identified, including the high latency of cybercrime, its cross-border nature, and the use of advanced technologies by offenders, such as anonymisation tools, cryptocurrencies, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and automated systems. The study examines legal, institutional, and organisational mechanisms for combating cybercrime in Ukraine and internationally, with particular attention to international legal standards, including the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, EU legal instruments, and recommendations of international organisations. The article highlights the growing importance of integrating innovative technologies into law enforcement practice, including digital forensics, artificial intelligence for big data analysis, automated threat detection systems, and advanced monitoring tools. It is emphasised that digital forensics as an emerging scientific field significantly enhances pre-trial investigation, evidence collection, and the administration of justice in cybercrime cases. The author argues that effective counteraction to cybercrime requires a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach combining legal reform, technological innovation, professional training, cybersecurity awareness, and strengthened international cooperation. Special attention is given to the need to adapt criminal justice mechanisms under martial law, where cyber threats to critical infrastructure intensify. Strengthening cybercrime prevention is essential for ensuring national and information security
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on cybercrime (Budapest Convention). https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention
European Union. (2013). Directive 2013/40/EU on attacks against information systems. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/40/oj
European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2 Directive). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555
Europol. (2023). Internet organised crime threat assessment (IOCTA). https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-events/main-reports/internet-organised-crime-threat-assessment
ENISA. (2023). ENISA threat landscape 2023. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2023
Halushko, P. P. (2025). Cybercrime: Concept and socio-legal nature. Visnyk Kryminolohichnoi Asotsiatsii Ukrainy, 34(1), 808–817. https://doi.org/10.32631/vca.2025.1.66
Helzhynska, T. Ya., & Kravchyk, O. R. (2025). Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence in education: Ukrainian and European experience. Akademichni vizii, 42, 1–11. https://academy-vision.org/index.php/av/article/view/1897
INTERPOL. (2023). Global crime trend report. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2023/INTERPOL-Global-Crime-Trend-Report
Luhivska, L. R., Yatsyshyn, O. O., & Liubavina, V. P. (2024). Trends in the development of criminal liability for cybercrime in the context of digitalisation of society. Dictum Factum, 2(16), 258–264. https://df.duit.in.ua/index.php/dictum/article/view/363
Lysko, T. D., Melanich, V. V., & Slavita, Yu. V. (2022). Counteracting cybercrime: Current state of national legislation and foreign experience. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, 96, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.32782/apdp.v96.2022.4
Maras, M.-H. (2016). Cybercriminology. Oxford University Press.
Microsoft. (2023). Microsoft digital defense report. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/business/microsoft-digital-defense-report
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity. https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework
NABU. (n.d.). Chief specialist of the digital forensics laboratory detective unit. https://nabu.gov.ua/robota-v-nabu/perelik-vakansiy/golovnyyi-spetcialist-pidrozdilu-detektiviv-tcyfrovo-kryminalistychno-laboratori/
Shevchuk, V. M. (2023). Use of artificial intelligence technologies and the process of digitalisation of criminalistics in wartime. In Proceedings of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference “Actual problems of combating crime and corruption” (pp. 171–176).
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Comprehensive study on cybercrime (updated materials). https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/cybercrime/global-programme-cybercrime.html
Verizon. (2024). Data breach investigations report (DBIR). https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/
Wall, D. S. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Polity Press.
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global cybersecurity outlook 2024. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-cybersecurity-outlook-2024
Yak v Ukraini rozsliduiut kiberzlochyny? (n.d.). Merezha UPLAN. https://uplan.org.ua/analytics/iak-v-ukraini-rozsliduiut-kiberzlochyny/