Minimum Age Limit of Criminal Responsibility for Child Drug Couriers Based on the Principle of the Best Interest of the Child
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the lowest age for being held criminally accountable for children involved as drug couriers in Indonesia, emphasizing The approach that underscores the necessity of safeguarding the child’s best interests as a primary consideration. Under Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law), the current minimum age is established at 12 years. However, this threshold is considered inconsistent with child psychological development, international legal standards, and the demands of Indonesia’s national legal framework. The objective of this research is to assess the appropriateness of this age limit and propose recommendations for progressive policy reforms. Employing a normative legal research method, this study adopts a statutory approach complemented by comparative law and legal theory analysis. Data collection relies on a literature review encompassing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The analytical method used is descriptive-analytical, which evaluates the appropriateness of the minimum age for Liability arising from unlawful actions through the lenses of legal and psychological perspectives. The findings reveal that children at the age of 12 generally lack the mental, emotional, and cognitive maturity to Understand the implications that arise from the decisions they make. For example, Germany sets the minimum age at 14 years, adopting a rehabilitative framework centered on education and care, which has effectively upheld children's rights while mitigating the adverse impacts of the criminal justice process. In Indonesia, the juvenile justice system must align more closely with the principle of the child’s best interests, as articulated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the SPPA Law. The research concludes that Indonesia should raise the minimum age of juvenile Liability arising from unlawful actions to 15 years. Such a policy is anticipated to foster a more equitable, humane legal system that supports the developmental needs of children. Additionally, regular reviews of the SPPA Law are essential to ensure the juvenile justice system remains relevant to evolving societal conditions and contemporary scientific insights.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Agustiawan, M. H., Pujiyono, P., & Rozah, U. (2023). Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Perspektif Neurolaw. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v4i2.18206
Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Amaldy, M. N., & Setiyono. (2024). Perbandingan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif Pada Pelaku Anak Di Indonesia Dan Jerman: Comparison of the Concept of Restorative Justice for Child Offenders in Indonesia and Germany. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i4.21488
Anwar, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v17i1.5361
Aqsa, A., & Isnur, M. (2012). Mengawal Perlindungan Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum. LBH Jakarta.
Ariani, N. V. (2014). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak dalam upaya melindungi kepentingan anak. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v21i1.1160
Bandalli, S. (1998). Abolition of the Presumption of Doli Incapax and the Criminalisation of Children. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00084
Blakemore, S.-J. (2018). Avoiding Social Risk in Adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738144
Djamil, M. N. (2013). Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum. Sinar Grafika.
Ferguson, M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2011). Criminal Responsibility Evaluations: Role of Psychologists in Assessment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13218719.2010.482952
Gultom, M. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dan Perempuan (Bandung). PT. Refika Aditama.
Hendra Cipto, K. (2018, September 13). Kisah Murid SD Bandar Narkoba, Sebulan Jadi Buronan Polisi. KOMPAS.com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/13/07000091/kisah-murid-sd-bandar-narkoba-sebulan-jadi-buronan-polisi
Hidayati, N. (2013). Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dan Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak. Ragam, 13(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.polines.ac.id/index.php/ragam/article/view/476
Ibda, F. (2023). Perkembangan Moral Dalam Pandangan Lawrence Kohlberg. Intelektualita, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/ji.v12i1.19256
ICJR, I. for C. J. R. (2015). Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Sebaiknya Ditingkatkan. https://icjr.or.id/icjr-usia-minimum-pertanggungjawaban-pidana-anak-sebaiknya-ditingkatkan/
Iqbal, M. (2019). Hukum Pidana. Unpam Press.
Kambam, P., & Thompson, C. (2009). The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: Psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.859
Kamil, M. I. (2013). Kebijakan Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum [Masters, Universitas Diponegoro]. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/57524/
Koesno, A. (2014). Diversi Tindak Pidana Narkotika Anak. Setara Press.
Krisnawati, D., & Utami, N. S. B. (2021). Penanganan Terhadap Anak Belum Berumur 12 Tahun Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, OLD WEBSITE OF JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM, 32(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.40313
Marinda, L. (2020). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget Dan Problematikanya Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. An-Nisa Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v13i1.26
Neuropsych. (2022, January 31). Why is 18 the age of adulthood if the brain can take 30 years to mature? Big Think. https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/adult-brain/
P, M. A. C., Achjar, K. A. H., Ningsi, Rusliyadi, M., Zaenurrosyid, A., Rumata, N. A., Nirwana, I., & Abadi, A. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Panduan Praktis untuk Analisis Data Kualitatif dan Studi Kasus. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Prasetyo, A. (2020). Perekrutan dan Kegiatan Anak Sebagai Kurir dalam Jaringan Peredaran Narkoba. Airlangga Development Journal, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20473/adj.v3i1.18148
Prasetyo, T. (2012). Hukum Pidana. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Pasal 28B ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.
Saleh, R. (2002). Pikiran-Pikiran tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sedarmayanti, S. (2009). Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Produktifitas Kerja. Mandar Maju.
Simanjuntak, B. (2006). Kriminologi. Tarsito.
Sitepu, R. I. (2022). Peninjauan Kembali Batas Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Yang Terlibat Perdagangan Narkotika. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.90
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=7086
Soetodjo, W. (2008). Hukum Pidana Anak. Refika Aditama.
Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(Volume 5, 2009), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153603
Syahrum, M. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. CV. Dotplus Publisher.
UNICEF. (1989). The Convention on the Rights of the Child: The children’s. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text-childrens-version
Unicef. (2024). Konvensi Hak Anak: Versi anak anak | UNICEF Indonesia. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/id/konvensi-hak-anak-versi-anak-anak
Wahyuni, F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. PT Nusantara Persada Utama.