Minimum Age Limit of Criminal Responsibility for Child Drug Couriers Based on the Principle of the Best Interest of the Child

Main Article Content

Feny Fathuri Yan Putri
Prija Djatmika
Yuliati

Abstract

This study examines the lowest age for being held criminally accountable for children involved as drug couriers in Indonesia, emphasizing The approach that underscores the necessity of safeguarding the child’s best interests as a primary consideration. Under Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA Law), the current minimum age is established at 12 years. However, this threshold is considered inconsistent with child psychological development, international legal standards, and the demands of Indonesia’s national legal framework. The objective of this research is to assess the appropriateness of this age limit and propose recommendations for progressive policy reforms. Employing a normative legal research method, this study adopts a statutory approach complemented by comparative law and legal theory analysis. Data collection relies on a literature review encompassing primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The analytical method used is descriptive-analytical, which evaluates the appropriateness of the minimum age for Liability arising from unlawful actions through the lenses of legal and psychological perspectives. The findings reveal that children at the age of 12 generally lack the mental, emotional, and cognitive maturity to Understand the implications that arise from the decisions they make. For example, Germany sets the minimum age at 14 years, adopting a rehabilitative framework centered on education and care, which has effectively upheld children's rights while mitigating the adverse impacts of the criminal justice process. In Indonesia, the juvenile justice system must align more closely with the principle of the child’s best interests, as articulated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the SPPA Law. The research concludes that Indonesia should raise the minimum age of juvenile Liability arising from unlawful actions to 15 years. Such a policy is anticipated to foster a more equitable, humane legal system that supports the developmental needs of children. Additionally, regular reviews of the SPPA Law are essential to ensure the juvenile justice system remains relevant to evolving societal conditions and contemporary scientific insights.

Article Details

Section

ARTICLES

How to Cite

Minimum Age Limit of Criminal Responsibility for Child Drug Couriers Based on the Principle of the Best Interest of the Child. (2024). LEGAL HORIZONS, 22(3), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2024.3.pp.46-56

References

Agustiawan, M. H., Pujiyono, P., & Rozah, U. (2023). Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Perspektif Neurolaw. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v4i2.18206

Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Amaldy, M. N., & Setiyono. (2024). Perbandingan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif Pada Pelaku Anak Di Indonesia Dan Jerman: Comparison of the Concept of Restorative Justice for Child Offenders in Indonesia and Germany. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i4.21488

Anwar, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v17i1.5361

Aqsa, A., & Isnur, M. (2012). Mengawal Perlindungan Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum. LBH Jakarta.

Ariani, N. V. (2014). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak dalam upaya melindungi kepentingan anak. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v21i1.1160

Bandalli, S. (1998). Abolition of the Presumption of Doli Incapax and the Criminalisation of Children. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2311.00084

Blakemore, S.-J. (2018). Avoiding Social Risk in Adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738144

Djamil, M. N. (2013). Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum. Sinar Grafika.

Ferguson, M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2011). Criminal Responsibility Evaluations: Role of Psychologists in Assessment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13218719.2010.482952

Gultom, M. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dan Perempuan (Bandung). PT. Refika Aditama.

Hendra Cipto, K. (2018, September 13). Kisah Murid SD Bandar Narkoba, Sebulan Jadi Buronan Polisi. KOMPAS.com. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/13/07000091/kisah-murid-sd-bandar-narkoba-sebulan-jadi-buronan-polisi

Hidayati, N. (2013). Peradilan Pidana Anak dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif dan Kepentingan Terbaik bagi Anak. Ragam, 13(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.polines.ac.id/index.php/ragam/article/view/476

Ibda, F. (2023). Perkembangan Moral Dalam Pandangan Lawrence Kohlberg. Intelektualita, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/ji.v12i1.19256

ICJR, I. for C. J. R. (2015). Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Sebaiknya Ditingkatkan. https://icjr.or.id/icjr-usia-minimum-pertanggungjawaban-pidana-anak-sebaiknya-ditingkatkan/

Iqbal, M. (2019). Hukum Pidana. Unpam Press.

Kambam, P., & Thompson, C. (2009). The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: Psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.859

Kamil, M. I. (2013). Kebijakan Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum [Masters, Universitas Diponegoro]. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/57524/

Koesno, A. (2014). Diversi Tindak Pidana Narkotika Anak. Setara Press.

Krisnawati, D., & Utami, N. S. B. (2021). Penanganan Terhadap Anak Belum Berumur 12 Tahun Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, OLD WEBSITE OF JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM, 32(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.40313

Marinda, L. (2020). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget Dan Problematikanya Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. An-Nisa Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v13i1.26

Neuropsych. (2022, January 31). Why is 18 the age of adulthood if the brain can take 30 years to mature? Big Think. https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/adult-brain/

P, M. A. C., Achjar, K. A. H., Ningsi, Rusliyadi, M., Zaenurrosyid, A., Rumata, N. A., Nirwana, I., & Abadi, A. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Panduan Praktis untuk Analisis Data Kualitatif dan Studi Kasus. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Prasetyo, A. (2020). Perekrutan dan Kegiatan Anak Sebagai Kurir dalam Jaringan Peredaran Narkoba. Airlangga Development Journal, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20473/adj.v3i1.18148

Prasetyo, T. (2012). Hukum Pidana. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Pasal 28B ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Saleh, R. (2002). Pikiran-Pikiran tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sedarmayanti, S. (2009). Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Produktifitas Kerja. Mandar Maju.

Simanjuntak, B. (2006). Kriminologi. Tarsito.

Sitepu, R. I. (2022). Peninjauan Kembali Batas Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Yang Terlibat Perdagangan Narkotika. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.90

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=7086

Soetodjo, W. (2008). Hukum Pidana Anak. Refika Aditama.

Steinberg, L. (2009). Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(Volume 5, 2009), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153603

Syahrum, M. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. CV. Dotplus Publisher.

UNICEF. (1989). The Convention on the Rights of the Child: The children’s. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text-childrens-version

Unicef. (2024). Konvensi Hak Anak: Versi anak anak | UNICEF Indonesia. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/id/konvensi-hak-anak-versi-anak-anak

Wahyuni, F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. PT Nusantara Persada Utama.