International compensation models for compensation for damage caused by armed aggression as tools for the protection of human rights

Main Article Content

Анатолій Шевченко
Юрій Бадахов

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of international compensation models for compensation for damage caused by military actions, with a special emphasis on the activities of the International Criminal Court. The legal nature of reparations as a tool for restoring the violated rights of victims as a result of international crimes is investigated. The main types of reparations are disclosed, in particular, restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition, as well as the features of their application in international practice. The mechanisms for implementing reparations in the activities of the ICC are analyzed, including the role of the Trust Fund for Victims. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the Court's modern practice, which demonstrates the gradual formation of a comprehensive approach to compensation for damage. International compensation mechanisms operating outside the ICC are investigated, in particular, the activities of the UN Compensation Commission and the creation of the Register of Damages for Ukraine as an element of the future compensation system. Their legal nature, functional features and significance for the formation of an effective compensation model are determined. Separately, the main problems of implementing international compensation mechanisms are analyzed, including limited financial resources, the complexity of implementing decisions, and institutional restrictions. It is established that existing mechanisms do not always provide full and timely compensation for victims. In this regard, the need to improve international compensation models through their institutional integration and expansion of funding sources is substantiated. Special emphasis is placed on the relevance of the researched issues for Ukraine in the context of armed aggression and the need to form an effective system of compensation for damage. As a result, a conclusion is formulated on the expediency of combining mechanisms of international criminal justice and specialized compensation instruments. It is substantiated that a comprehensive approach to compensation for damage is a key prerequisite for restoring the rights of victims and ensuring justice

Article Details

Section

ARTICLES

How to Cite

International compensation models for compensation for damage caused by armed aggression as tools for the protection of human rights. (2026). LEGAL HORIZONS, 29(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.54477/LH.25192353.2026.2.pp.49-58

References

Activités militaires et paramilitaires au Nicaragua et contre celui-ci (Nicaragua c. Etats-Unis d'Amérique). Arrêt du 26 novembre 1984 // Cour Internationale de Justice : офіц. сайт. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/fr/affaire/70/arrets (дата звернення: 06.04.2026).

Case “Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)”. Judgment of 19 December 2005 // International Court of Justice : офіц. сайт. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/node/103161 (дата звернення: 26.08.2025); Case “Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)”. Judgment of 9 February 2022 // International Court of Justice : офіц. сайт. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/node/106106 (дата звернення: 26.08.2025).

Case “Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica)”. Judgment of 16 December 2015 // International Court of Justice : офіц. сайт. URL: https://www.icjcij.org/node/103192 (дата звернення: 06.04.2026).

Case “Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/ Slovakia)”. Judgment of 25 September 1997 // International Court of Justice : офіц. сайт. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/node/103193 (дата звернення: 06.04.2026).

Charter of the United Nations: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_010?find (дата звернення 06.04.2026).

International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of states for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf (дата звернення 06.04.2026).

Kanienberh-Sandul, O. K. (2022). Evoliutsiia stvorennia systemy mizhnarodnoho pravosuddia. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, (1). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-1/79

Register of Damage for Ukraine (RD4U) URL : https://rd4u.coe.int/uk/home (дата звернення 07.04.2026).

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court]. (n.d.).: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_588#Text. (дата звернення 06.04.2026).

Understanding the International Criminal Court]. (2023). https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2023-06/UICC-UKR-rgb.pdf. (дата звернення 06.04.2026).

Vazhna, K. A. (2016). Problemy vyznachennia poniattia mizhnarodnoho zlochynu ahresii u suchasnomu mizhnarodnomu pravi. Molodyi vchenyi, 4.1(31.1), 30–34.

Voitsikhovskyi, A. V., Kolomiiets, Yu. M., & Vatamaniuk, R. V. (2025). Vidshkoduvannia shkody yak forma mizhnarodno-pravovoi vidpovidalnosti RF za zbroinu ahresiiu proty Ukrainy. Pravo i bezpeka, (4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.32631/pb.2025.4.01

Zhenevski konventsii pro zakhyst zhertv viiny 1949 roku [Geneva Conventions relative to the Protection of War Victims, 1949]. (n.d.). https://www.ombudsman.gov.ua/uk/zhenevski-konvenciyi-pro-zahist-zhertv-vijni-1949-roku (дата звернення 06.04.2026).

Kozachenko, O. V., & Musychenko, O. M. (2024). Restytutsiino-kompensatsiini zakhody

v kryminalnomu pravi. Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo. https://doi.

org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.03.79